What in the world?

This is in regard to Monica Rez's article in her blog about 'Why Dogs should be killed if chicken are'. And Monica, just so that you know, your article doesn't have a title. You may read the article here.

Below are the points supporting my argument against her debate :

1. Be realistic. Are you practical? If you say no, well then, argument closed. I win. If you say yes, continue reading. If you are really practical, do you think it is completely humane to eat creatures that are not meant to be eaten? Speaking from your angle, human can eat human. That is really unnatural. And so, do you agree human can eat human? If you do, go say the same thing to the public. We'll see what their retort will be.

2. It's totally part of the food chain. Think realistically, Monica. Think of it this way. The world stops eating chicken for one week. Just one week. Only one week. The 8th day you wake up, the roads are gonna be full of chicken.

3. See. Distinguishing between animals is NOT like distinguishing between human. Human is one class here. Animals are a kingdom of creatures. Therefore, some are meant to be hunted, some are meant to be eaten for survival and some are meant to be killed for human needs.

4. Yes, I know that you said you are not saying people shouldn't eat non-veg. This article is just to say I do not think dogs are not meant to be eaten if chicken are. Same applies to penguins, cats, frogs, polar bears and other selected creatures.